Episode Transcript

Double Possessives
Episode 128: August 22, 2008

Grammar Girl here.

Today’s lesson involves a question of Cathy’s—or should that be “a question of Cathy”? By the end of this podcast, you’ll know which possessive to use. 

 But first, I want to remind you that you can get a free audiobook when you sign up for an Audible account at audiblepodcast.com/gg. They now have over 40,000 titles for you to choose from.  

Also, stay tuned to the end of the podcast for an announcement about a contest.

Now, Cathy has been wondering about the so-called double possessive and asks, “Which is correct—‘I am a friend of Fred’ or ‘I am a friend of Fred’s’?” She points out that it would sound normal to say, “He’s a friend of mine,” and "mine" is the possessive.  

 Guest-writer Bonnie Trenga answers.

 
Cathy's right, though you usually use only one possessive at a time. Many purists believe that double possessives should be relegated to informal and semiformal writing, if at all. Nevertheless, double possessives have appeared in good writing for centuries, and most people will find themselves using them on occasion (1).
 
How to Create Possessives
 
You use possessives to indicate who owns what. If Squiggly owns a car, you say, “This is Squiggly's car.” You use an apostrophe plus an "s" on the end of “Squiggly.” You can also form a possessive by using the word “of,” such as “The Crown Jewels of the United Kingdom.” (Of course, you could also say, “the United Kingdom’s Crown Jewels.”) These examples are just normal possessives. There’s nothing double about them. The confusion arises when you use both ways of making possessives at the same time, as in “a friend of Fred’s.” Here you have an apostrophe plus an "s" plus an “of.” Although such a double possessive is allowed, I personally prefer “Fred’s friend” over “a friend of Fred’s.” Why not just say, "He's Fred's friend"?
 
Incorrect Possessives
 
Nevertheless, to help us learn what’s right, let’s look at some possessives and double possessives that native speakers wouldn't use. It definitely sounds odd to say, “a car of Squiggly.” On the other hand, you could say, “a car of Squiggly's,” assuming he has lots of cars and you’re pointing out one of them. However, “a car of Squiggly's” doesn’t sound as natural to me as “one of Squiggly's cars.”
 
On the other hand, it’s perfectly normal to say, “the Crown Jewels of the United Kingdom” or “the United Kingdom’s Crown Jewels,” but it turns out that it’s ungrammatical to say, “the Crown Jewels of the United Kingdom’s.” Here’s a clear-cut rule that helps explain this: When you’re talking about inanimate objects—objects that aren’t alive, such as “the United Kingdom”—you can’t use a double possessive (2). According to The New Fowler's Modern English Usage, for a double possessive to be legal, the object of the preposition “of” has to be “definite and human.” In other words, it’s fine to say, “a friend of my uncle’s” but not “a friend of the museum’s.” You have to say, “a friend of the museum.” However, according to this rule, it would be OK to say, “He's a friend of a friend’s,” but we’ve all heard the common expression “a friend of a friend.” I guess double possessives don’t always work. That should make some sticklers happy.
 
Avoiding Double Possessives
 
We could clear this all up by stating that we should just always avoid double possessives. Perhaps that would make life easier. Instead of “a friend of my uncle’s” or “a car of Squiggly's,” maybe we should always say, “my uncle’s friend” or “Squiggly’s car.” For the most part, you can’t go wrong if you follow this advice. You should probably avoid the double possessive anyway if you’re using formal English.
 
Useful Double Possessives
 
There are, however, some cases when a double possessive is very useful to help clarify your meaning.
 
For example, if you attempt to avoid the double possessive and say something like "This is Marie's portrait," you end up with an ambiguous sentence that could mean you are looking at a portrait of Marie or a portrait that is owned by Marie. You can fix the problem by substituting one of two sentences depending on what you mean. If you mean Marie owns the portrait, then the double possessive makes it clear: "This is a portrait of Marie's." On the other hand, if it is a lovely rendering of Marie, "This is a portrait of Marie" will serve you well.
 
Another time when you might need to use a double possessive is if you want to use a possessive pronoun, such as “theirs,” “hers,” or "mine," as Cathy noted in her initial question. In fact, it’s impossible to avoid using a double possessive in cases such as “She is a relative of his.” If you don’t like double possessives, you could reword such sentences by saying, “She is his relative,” “She is one of his relatives,” or, simply, “They are related.”
 
Double possessives might also be necessary if you’re using a “that,” “those,” “this,” or “these” in your possessive (3). For example, “the hat of Aardvark’s” sounds a bit odd to me, whereas “that hat of Aardvark’s” sounds a lot more natural.
 
In Summary
 
That question of Cathy’s was pretty tricky. Or, rather, I might prefer to say, “Cathy’s question was pretty tricky.” The double possessive does have legitimate uses, but you might want to avoid the redundant possessive in formal writing and perhaps use only one possessive at a time if it sounds natural.

Administrative

This show was written by Bonnie Trenga, author of
The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier, who blogs at http://sentencesleuth.blogspot.com.

I've been sick for a whole week now, and after a while it gets boring just lying in bed. I exhausted my supply of favorite podcasts and ended up going to Audible.com and getting the audiobook version of "When You Are Engulfed in Flames" by David Sedaris. Not only is it a best-selling book, but while I was out on my book tour last month I kept hearing stories from booksellers about what a hilarious guy David Sedaris is in person, and the book didn't let me down. I wouldn't say it's for everyone--it has a lot more profanity and stories with, ahem, adult themes than I remember his previous book having--but if you're not easily offended it's an entertaining listen. And of course, it's one of the over 40,000 titles you can choose from when you sign up for an Audible account at audiblepodcast.com/gg. That's audiblepodcast.com/gg.


Also this week, we've launched a new podcast called The Public Speaker's Quick and Dirty Tips for Improving Your Communication Skills. It's already getting great reviews, so head over to iTunes and check it out.
 
Finally, this is the last week to enter the Quick and Dirty Tips drawing at the website. We're giving away $300 and 10 signed copies of my book, Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. There are two ways to enter. First, anyone who's signed up for the free e-mail newsletter, which gives you free grammar tips, is already entered; and second, if you're not signed up for the newsletter you can enter the drawing directly by clicking on the orange "Win a Cell Phone or MP3 player" banner in the right-hand sidebar at QuickandDirtyTips.com. The deadline to enter is August 31, so head over to QuickandDirtyTips.com today and sign up for the newsletter or enter the drawing directly.


That's all. Thanks for listening.


 
References
 
1. Wilson, K.G. The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. Columbia University Press, 1993, http://www.bartleby.com/68/99/1999.html (accessed August 16, 2008).
2. Burchfield, R. W, ed. The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage. Third edition. New York: Oxford, 1996, p. 227.
3. Garner, B. Garner's Modern American Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003, pp. p. 624-25.
 

Comments (10) for Double Possessives |  Subscribe to Comment

steve-o Says:
8/31/2008 10:35:56 AM
first, I need a grammar coach for my blog! Second, this one is driving me crazy. I have a website called Film Noir of the Week. If I use a sentence like this: "This week's selection is The Man with the Golden Arm" is it "week's" or "weeks"
rpmason Says:
8/26/2008 9:36:09 AM
phil3ip. If you disagree with what purists believe, provide your reasoning and argue your point--tell us why. Saying that it's wrong and claiming that you can't parse the sentence won't convince many people.
phil3ip Says:
8/26/2008 12:09:36 AM
a friend of Fred's But, what's with your second sentence? The final three words are simply wrong. "Many purists believe that double possessives should be relegated to informal and semiformal writing, if at all." I suppose it's grammatical, but it doesn't mean much. If you counter with "Well, you know what she was trying to say," then there's not much point in having her say it at all, is there!
aardvark Says:
8/24/2008 10:44:58 AM
Hi Marcio, Both are correct although aardvark believes that when the possessive adjective "my" is put before the noun, the expression is more emphatic than when a prepositional phrase is used to modify a noun. aardvark would opt for "my friend" over "of mine."
Márcio Says:
8/24/2008 1:04:58 AM
Good episode!! And about the use of "MY FRIEND" and "A FRIEND OF MINE"??? Is that any difference??? thanks
sheena Says:
8/23/2008 10:52:31 PM
friend of fred
mary Says:
8/23/2008 1:08:54 PM
This is off topic, but i've done some searches and can't find any matching posts. what is the correct use or the phrase "or not/or no" as in: 'Are you coming to the store with us, or not?' I have heard both versions used, though I had always believed "or not" was correct. Then I heard NBC commentator Brian Williams say, "Are you considering returning for the 2012 games, or no?" Does anyone know the correct usage?
aardvark Says:
8/22/2008 8:50:43 PM
That hat of Squiggly's used to be aarvark's hat.
Michelle Says:
8/22/2008 8:50:26 PM
I just saw a video of you at the SpicesOfLife.com site: http://spicesoflife.com/2008/08/06/grammar-girl-is-really-passionate-about-grammar/ I thought you might be interested. It was cool
Tricia Says:
8/22/2008 3:14:50 PM
"Friend of Fred"

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required