Episode Transcript

Good Debt Versus Bad Debt
Episode 65: March 18, 2008

Hello and welcome to Money Girl’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a Richer Life hosted by Elizabeth Carlassare.

Today I’m going to be talking about good debt versus bad debt.

Many people think that all debt is bad and is something to be avoided and paid down as quickly as possible. But, there are really two types of debt: good debt and bad debt.

Now, one quick and dirty rule of thumb for identifying whether a particular debt is good or bad is to ask yourself whether the debt is financing something that’s appreciating or depreciating in a value. If the debt is financing something that’s going up in value, it’s usually “good debt.” On the other hand, if it’s financing something that’s losing value, it’s usually “bad debt.”

Examples of good debt would be the mortgage on your home and a loan for a college education. A mortgage finances a house, an asset that, over the long term, goes up in value, and a student loan finances an education, which is likely to result in a higher paying job and better employability down the road—at least that’s the idea any way.

An example of bad debt would be a car loan—most new cars lose more than half of their value within the first five years after being bought. A second example of “bad debt” would be money you borrow to buy something that’s losing value that you could actually afford to buy without a loan, like a dinner out, for example.

Ok, so that’s the difference between good debt and bad debt, but what’s the smartest way to pay off debt? When tackling debt, it’s a good idea to start paying down your highest interest loans first, especially if they’re financing items that are losing value. For almost everyone, this means paying down your highest rate credit cards first. After that, work on paying off your lower rate consumer loans, like a car loan.

After you’ve paid off these types of debts, the next step would be working toward paying off your “good debts” if—and this is a big if—if you don’t have a better use for the money. If you can invest your money at a higher rate of return than the interest rate on the debt, you’re usually better off investing the money instead and paying down the debt more slowly.

If you do have a mortgage, you don’t necessarily want to rush to pay it off more quickly. Mortgages typically have low rates compared with other types of loans and, in the U.S. and several other countries, the interest you pay on your mortgage is tax deductible.
 
Cha-ching! That's all for now, courtesy of Money Girl, your guide to a richer life.

You can e-mail your questions and comments to money@quickanddirtytips.com. Thanks for listening!


Comments (9) for Good Debt Versus Bad Debt |  Subscribe to Comment

Matt Says:
3/19/2008 2:17:59 PM
Question about dept: How does inflation impact dept? A simple model: If I have a savings account, I take the interest minus inflation rate and that is the actual rate of return for my savings. SO, if I have a credit card with intrest of 10% and inflation is 4% what is my actual rate of return, or dept in the case? Thanks Matt
Amanda Moore Says:
3/12/2008 5:57:30 AM
Thanks very much for your article - It has given me a new perspective on how to tackle my current stressful financial sitution. I was thinking about using these people to sell my home but now im not so sure if thats the right thing to do...
Amanda Hoyt Says:
2/20/2008 10:31:56 AM
I enjoyed learning how to work my way out of debt.
Christi Says:
1/14/2008 9:54:43 PM
This is excellent!
Money Girl Says:
12/31/2006 9:28:52 PM
Wow! Good reason to avoid using "rule of thumb" in the future. Thanks for sharing the origin of the term.
Robert Evans Says:
12/31/2006 5:40:42 AM
I did a quick Lexis search for legal references on "rule of thumb" in
relation to wife beating. I didn't have time for a really refined search
but below are short relevant excerpts.

n86 The husband's right to discipline his wife has a long
history at commonlaw, related to the concept of wives as
chattel. For a review of the changing scope of the
disciplinary prerogative at common law, see UNITED STATES
COMM'N ON CIVIL RIGHTS, UNDER THE RULE OF THUMB: BATTERED
WOMEN AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 14, 21 (1982), supra
note 41, at 1-3; Eppler, supra note 13, at 791-93; Note,
supra note 16, at 705.

34 Emory L.J. 855, *874
Historically, wife beating has been an acceptable
practice both socially and legally. The right of a husband
to physically chastise his wife was inherited from the
British Common Law tradition which considered married people
to be one person, specifically the husband, n91 and, which
gave the husband who beat his wife immunity from
prosecution. In Bradley v. State, n92 a
Mississippi court articulated and adopted this form of
immunity, holding that a husband should be able to
moderately chastise his wife without subjecting himself
to vexatious prosecution for assault and battery. Moderate
chastisement was measured by the " rule of thumb" which
allowed a husband to beat his wife with a stick no thicker
than his thumb. n93 The societal basis for this legal
acceptance of wife beating may be seen in the results of a
survey conducted for [*875] the National Commission on
the Causes and Prevention ofViolence, which found that
twenty-five percent of college educated men interviewed felt
that physical chastisement of a spouse was acceptable in
some situations. n94


106 Harv. L. Rev. 1501, *1502
II. Historical Underpinnings of Wife Abuse
When you see your wife commit an offense, don't rush at
her with insults and violent blows . . . . Scold her
sharply, bully and terrify her. And if this still doesn't
work . . . take up a stick and beat her soundly, for it is
better to punish the body and correct the soul than to
damage the soul and spare the body . . . . Then readily
beat her, not in rage but out of charity and concern for her
soul, so that the beating will redound to your merit and
her good. n4


106 Harv. L. Rev. 1501, *1501
Domestic violence is not a new problem. History is
replete with reports of domestic abuse, n11 and despite the
community-wide repercussions of domestic violence, an
adequate legal response has long been lacking. In fact,
United States law condoned wife abuse and protected the
right of men to beat their wives through the midnineteenth
century. n12 In the late 1800s, shifting public attitudes
prompted some states to eliminate explicit legal protection
for batterers, and several instituted a range of punishments
for abusive husbands. n13 Most early reform efforts,
however, focused primarily on maintaining the family
structure and failed
Bryan Person Says:
12/23/2006 12:44:19 PM
Great first podcast, Money Girl! Looking forward to future episodes.
Hazee Daze Says:
12/22/2006 6:14:08 PM
Finally I can understand some of these "financial terms" I'm always hearing. I esp. liked hearing about investing vs. paying off my mortgage. Great stuff, thanks Money Girl.
mr ce Says:
12/21/2006 7:05:39 AM
I liked the straight and to the point pod cast.

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required