Lessons in crisis communication from a presidential hopeful.
So here are the 4 standard rules for handling adverse news:
Be first and be fast
Tell it all yourself
Tell it to your supporters on your home turf
Mistake #1: He Wasn’t the First to Break the Story
In this case, Cain’s campaign could have easily broken the news first because according to Politico, they asked the Cain campaign about the sexual harassment allegations 10 days before running the story. He had plenty of time to prepare and to break the story on his own terms. It’s always best to come forward immediately, so that you can define the issue. If you don’t define the issue, others will just define it for you.
Cain could have simply stated right from the start, “Yes, I was accused of sexual harassment in his past. However, after an objective investigation, the accusations were found to be baseless. I’m publically releasing all the documentation relating to this matter so we can call stay focused on the important issues facing our nation.”
End of story. But that’s not what happened.
Mistake #2: He Didn’t Tell All
When the story first broke, Herman Cain denied the allegations. Then he explained one accusation, then later he “suddenly remembered” more and gave different statements about the issue. By revising his story several times, he caused further questions.
When responding to a scandal or crisis, you need to tell the truth. You can’t sugarcoat. It’s important for you to be the one that communicates all of the damaging information. You need to provide enough detailed information to stop any speculation or rumors that might have already started.