Verbs Sandwiched Between Singular and Plural Nouns

Dealing with distracting predicate nouns.

Bonnie Mills, read by Mignon Fogarty,
August 14, 2009
Episode #183

verbs sandwiched between nous

Today, Bonnie Trenga will help us talk about tricky sentences that make you question whether you should use a singular or plural verb.

Today we’re talking about a tricky kind of sentence that causes you to make a mistake with subject-verb agreement. As we all learned in school, a singular subject agrees with a singular verb, and a plural subject agrees with a plural verb. Sometimes, though, other parts of the sentence get in the way and confuse you. Here's an example of the kind of sentence we’re talking about: “The star attractions at the museum were the art.” Or should it be “The star attractions at the museum was the art”?

Defining Our Problem

Before we can answer the “were” or “was” question in the museum sentence, we need to define the problem. The source of the conundrum is what’s called a distracting predicate noun. A predicate is what provides information about the subject (1). In the museum sentence, the predicate noun is “the art,” a singular word. The subject, “the star attractions,” on the other hand, is plural. So should the verb agree with the subject or the predicate noun?

Solving Our Problem

Although this problem may seem complicated, it’s really not. It’s as simple as this: the verb agrees with the subject (2), not the predicate noun. Therefore, “were” is correct in the museum sentence because the subject is “the star attractions,” a plural noun:

The star attractions in the museum were the art.

Dorothy, don’t pay attention to the man behind the curtain, meaning don’t be distracted by the predicate noun. One grammar source calls this problem “false attraction to a predicate noun” (3).

Let’s try out one more example. What’s the right verb here:

The real draw of this restaurant is the desserts.


The real draw of this restaurant are the desserts.

Well, you know not to be falsely attracted by “the desserts,” which is the predicate noun. Instead, let’s identify the subject; it’s “the real draw,” which is singular. Therefore, the verb must be “is”:

The real draw of this restaurant is the desserts.

What comes after the “is” doesn’t matter.

Sandwich image, Christian Cable at Flickr, CC BY 2.0

Next: How to Avoid the Problem

Avoiding Our Problem

Sentences that contain a singular subject and a plural predicate noun, or a plural subject and a singular predicate noun, often sound awkward. Take these two examples: “Her best feature is her legs,” and “Dirty diapers are the worst part of parenting.” Although these sentences are grammatically correct, they could make readers do a double take.

If you want to avoid the problem, just rewrite your sentence. You could try to make both the subject and the predicate noun singular, or both plural; if that doesn’t work, you’ll have to change the sentence. As far as the legs sentence, you probably shouldn't write, “Her best features are her legs,” or “Her best feature is her leg,” so if you wanted to rewrite it, you would have to change it. Perhaps “She has great legs” would suffice.

As far as the dirty diapers sentence, you could say, “Changing dirty diapers is the worst part of parenting,” among other things.


In summary, sometimes subject-verb agreement gets muddied by other parts of the sentence, but don’t let yourself become distracted. Determine whether the subject is singular or plural, and then match up your verb accordingly.

The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier

This podcast was written by Bonnie Trenga, author of The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier, who blogs at sentencesleuth.blogspot.com, and I'm Mignon Fogarty, the author of the New York Times bestseller Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing.


1. Stilman, A. Grammatically Correct. Cincinnati: Writer's Digest Books, 2004, p. 211.

2. Lutz, G. and  Stevenson, D. Grammar Desk Reference. Cincinnati: Writer's Digest Books, 2005, p. 94.

3. Garner, B. Garner's Modern American Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003, pp. 753-4.

You May Also Like...